India allow New Zealand to fight back and share honours

Through a mix of skills, imperfections and changes in the pitch’s behaviour, the opening day in Kanpur held the attention in a manner befitting of the occasion of a landmark Test

Sidharth Monga in Kanpur22-Sep-20161:49

Agarkar: Consistency was key for Santner

Kane Williamson the Test captain has big boots to fill. In the World T20, for example, not one press conference would go without a question on the leadership of Brendon McCullum, how New Zealand were going to miss him, and how Williamson was going to carry forward McCullum’s legacy. Williamson is his own man, he leads in his own way, and New Zealand fans would have hoped that Williamson would dissociate himself from McCullum’s habit of not winning tosses. It’s early days – Williamson came into this series with an even record – but if there was ever a series a visiting captain wanted to win tosses in, it is one in India, against this Indian Test side.

Tough surface to score on, agree Vijay and Santner

On where the match is right now
Vijay: “I think we are in a good position. We have put the runs on the board. All we got to do now is to go there, put pressure on them while bowling. It is a good total to play around with.”
Santner: “After losing the toss, I think we are in a reasonably good position. It was pretty flat to start with. They did bat well. We were lucky we got a few wickets here and there to pull it back. Obviously, we have to pick up this last wicket and then bat well, build partnerships.”
On the nature of the pitch
Vijay: “I won’t say it was difficult. It was difficult to score runs on this wicket. We have got to have a plan B, and patience. We have got to rethink our shot selection and stuff like that, and come back in the second innings and put up a better show.”
Santner: “The more you’re on the wicket, the more used you are going to get in terms of the surface getting a little harder to bat on, maybe. If you bowl in the right areas, it’s still quite hard to play. I guess you just have to do it for a longer period of time and then go from there.”

Especially on this Green Park pitch, which was dry, which had cracks, but which was watered enough in the lead-up to make sure it didn’t break up on day one. The humidity must have made it worse for New Zealand. You could see they were looking to bang the ball in, not just to test India against the short ball, but to rough it up for reverse swing. The first rule of reverse swing is no moisture on the rough side, but you can imagine how tough it would have been to execute that for Mark Craig, whose kit was dripping wet even before the end of the first session. You have been called upon to do a job in the first session of the series, you are looking to find the right length on a new pitch, but can you mind the sweat please while you are at it?”It’s very tough when you’re sweating quite a bit, but you just have to find a way to keep the ball dry to try get the reverse swing,” Mitchell Santner said. “Even for the spinners, to try and keep your hands dry is key to grip the ball.”It wasn’t helping that New Zealand’s spinners had shown that they were not versatile enough to be threatening on a surface that wasn’t yet doing much for them. It might be a slightly unfair expectation for bowlers who are rarely called upon to do the job on good surfaces. Yet, there were technical shortcomings, as noticed by Simon Doull on commentary. Santner doesn’t use his non-bowling arm much, which denies him dip and drift; Ish Sodhi’s release is beyond the perpendicular, which denies him sideways turn. These things begin to matter less when the pitch starts to turn square, which it wasn’t. So, they kept getting cut and pulled.Cheteshwar Pujara and M Vijay were now putting on a workshop on how to demoralise spinners who are unfamiliar with the conditions. Pujara frequently left his crease to take balls on the full or on the half-volley. Both Pujara and Vijay were alert to cut when this act forced the spinners to pitch short. Also, it has seemed New Zealand’s spinners have come more prepared for square turners where accuracy is more important. That’s what Daniel Vettori told Santner.”Our conversation was more about bowling the ball in one area for a longer period of time but still having plenty on it,” Santner said. “Not try and do too much, let the wicket come and play its part. With not so much turn, you try and be patient and build more dots, try and get wickets that way through false shots.”You can’t overnight become different kind of bowlers, but what will hurt New Zealand is that the spinners couldn’t stay as accurate as they would have wanted to on a slow pitch. “The wicket is on the slower side and it is difficult to score runs,” Vijay said. “That’s what we felt. It is going to be difficult for them as well with the quality of Ashwin and Jadeja in the side.””Yeah, I guess we might have been on the shorter side, but it’s about trying to find the pace that will suit for that wicket,” Santner said. “It might change in the second innings, I don’t know.”New Zealand’s bowlers were still going at 3.2 an over when things began to change. Around half-way into the day, Pujara got quite close to the pitch of a ball from Santner. There wasn’t a lot of distance for the ball to travel, but the ball still turned. It spooned off the outer half of the bat for an easy return catch. The ball had begun to turn now. The techniques mattered a little less, and New Zealand dipped into their reserves.This was a day when it seemed this new batting core will finally put things past a side when it’s down without any dramas. Pujara and Vijay had been fantastic, but they left the door ajar, which the rest failed to shut. Virat Kohli possibly came in looking to dominate. He is that kind of a player. He has been itching to dominate a touring side with the bat. This was his opportunity, he possibly thought. When you see a partnership of 112 at a fairly brisk pace, you don’t want to lose that momentum as the batsman going in. Neil Wagner played on the batsman’s ego, and drew the top edge.M Vijay admitted that it was a combination of poor shot selection and the deteriorating surface that had cost India•Associated PressAjinkya Rahane will be the first one to admit he didn’t move forward enough to be playing the defensive shot off the front foot. This was the mode of dismissal that had troubled him last year, but he overcame it. Rahane will be working to overcome this too. Vijay said the whole team will be.”A bit of both,” Vijay said. “We got out to loose shots as well. The wicket was deteriorating as well. We have got to be really patient on this wicket. It is a lesson learnt. We will, hopefully, put up a better show in the second innings.”The biggest lesson to learn is there for Rohit Sharma, who fell to a nothing loft, 20 minutes before stumps, giving Trent Boult the opportunity to run through the lower order. Vijay, though, extended Rohit the leeway that he didn’t to himself. After calling his dismissal a “bad shot selection”, he wasn’t as harsh on Rohit.”That’s his area, I guess,” Vijay said. “When it comes off, it always looks good. When it doesn’t, you fall on the wrong side. So I think we still got to back our instincts and play because we are playing in a sport where have got to win matches rather than just participate in a team. Whatever has got you here, you have to back that.”In the end, through the wonderful mix of skills, imperfections, passing of time, changes in the pitch, the toll of weather that Test cricket is, we had a day’s play befitting the occasion that India’s 500th Test has somehow become. Both teams – India because they have Ashwin and Jadeja, New Zealand because they made a comeback and because the turn is slow – could lay claim to holding the advantage.

South Africa successfully tackle the unexpected

Faced with the injury to Dean Elgar on the eve of the second Test, South Africa responded in positive fashion to finish day one in a position of control

Firdose Moonda in Centurion27-Aug-2016The language of modern sport lies in buzzwords and the one this week was adaptation. Neither South Africa, nor New Zealand, nor anyone else for that matter, knew what to expect from SuperSport Park in winter, but it turned out that was not what the hosts required adjusting to. Rather, they had to contend with two other quandaries: the loss of a certain starter in Dean Elgar and the shaky form of someone who has flirted with being dropped in JP Duminy. They dealt with both sans major drama to finish day one in control.Remember that South Africa are a team that prefers to play to plan. The most common criticism leveled at them is that they are unable to adjust to spontaneous challenges. On the eve of the Test, after the fielding drills were complete, Elgar was walking off the park when he wobbled on the boundary rope and sustained a grade three tear to his ankle. After all the concerns about player safety on the Kingsmead outfield, it turned out a pristine surface could be just as dangerous and contribute even more to derailing team strategy.Although his career is only 26 Tests old, Elgar is the senior opening partner and one of the most experienced members of the line-up. More importantly, South Africa did not have a reserve opener in their ranks which would have caused some consternation when choosing a replacement.They had three options: Stiaan van Zyl, who had opened in eights Test before and failed, Temba Bavuma, who opened in one and showed promise, and Quinton de Kock, who had never opened in Tests and had not done the job in South African domestic cricket since February 2014. The South Africa we know would have picked experience over an experiment and gone with either van Zyl or Bavuma. The South Africa we saw opted for de Kock.In numbers terms, the decision made sense because while van Zyl averaged 15.60 as an opener, and Bavuma scored 22 and 34 when he was given the chance, de Kock has opened 16 times in first-class cricket and averages 37.25 in the position. Perhaps the only reason he has not been seriously debated as an opener before is because his role with the gloves militates against it. Imagine if he had to keep for two days and then immediately go out to bat, or bat through the innings and then keep. That theory may not be tested in this match and it is likely the debate will continue after de Kock provided 82 reasons he could be considered for a longer-term role.De Kock survived a tense first hour in which New Zealand’s seamers probed his defences and Tim Southee almost broke through. The ball of the morning moved off the seam and snuck past the offstump and – as was the case for New Zealand for most of the day – was close but not close enough.The tug-of-war between de Kock’s attempts to assert himself and New Zealand’s to justify their captain’s decision to bowl first provided the most engaging cricket on New Zealand’s African safari so far. De Kock creamed Doug Bracewell through the covers; later in the over, Bracewell drew a top edge and, in the next over, drew him forward and beat the bat. De Kock whipped Bracewell off the pads and, off the next ball, Bracewell found an inside edge which BJ Watling could not hold on to. With even the outside edges off de Kock’s bat seemingly timed well enough to reach the boundary, it became clear he was winning the battle.For South Africa, to have someone with de Kock’s lively temperament at the other end along the more conservative Stephen Cook did wonders for the opening stand. Cook did not need to rush into run-scoring, which he may not have been able to do anyway because he rarely looked entirely comfortable at the crease. Instead, he built slowly.Through grit, grind and some good fortune, the pair put on the first century-stand for a South Africa top two since Graeme Smith and Alviro Petersen in December 2013, and that set South Africa up. Even when things did not come easily – and the end of day score may suggest they did – they had the security of that stand to build on.New Zealand will feel hard done by after what can be considered a decent day’s work scuppered by luck playing hide and seek with them. When it wasn’t denying Bracewell, who found several edges none of which went to hand, it was duping the umpires. Twice, Ian Gould turned down appeals for lbw – against Stephen Cook off Neil Wagner and against Duminy off Trent Boult- and twice, Kane Williamson did not review. In both instances, a review would have overturned the not-out decision. On the two occasions Gould raised his finger, to dismiss Hashim Amla off Boult and Duminy off Bracewell, the decisions were overturned on review.Duminy was the biggest beneficiary. Promoted to No. 4 for the second Test in succession, he has also had to adjust but mostly to the pressure over his place. The last time Duminy scored fifty was more than two years ago, against Zimbabwe in August 2014 – 10 completed innings ago. That could have become 11 when he edged the first ball he faced, but, fortunately for him, it went wide of second slip, to the boundary.During Duminy’s dry spell, there would be flickers of form that were snubbed out by poor shot selection and he threatened the same today. After rolling his wrists to send a short ball over long leg and leaning into drives, he pulled out a premeditated lap scoop which, if he made contact with, may have ended his career. He wore it instead and batted on. Duminy still has a long way to go to convince the critics there is significant life left in him as a Test cricketer but he had to start somewhere.So did South Africa. For all their concerns about a series becoming a one-off shootout and the uncertainty over the surface, they could not have had a better day in their bid to begin their climb back up the rankings.

Before Warner: How Yardley's 38-year record was made

Bruce Yardley had remarkably held the record for fastest fifty by an Australian – a 29-ball knock from No. 8 against the might of the West Indies pace attack

Brydon Coverdale at the SCG06-Jan-20171:04

The fastest Test fifties

The list of fastest hundreds in Test cricket reads like a who’s who of batting: Brendon McCullum, Viv Richards, Misbah-ul-Haq, Adam Gilchrist, Shivnarine Chanderpaul, David Warner, Chris Gayle, Roy Fredericks, Majid Khan. A few allrounders are scattered through, too – Jack Gregory and Kapil Dev, for example – but few bowlers. It is usually too difficult to sustain the agricultural style long enough to reach a century.But the list of fastest fifties is quite different. There are of course fine batsmen among them – Misbah, Jacques Kallis, Shahid Afridi, to name a few. But the group is also populated by tail-enders who rode their luck: Shane Shillingford, Dale Steyn and Tim Southee, for example. And there is one such name that has sat there for 38 years, the owner of the fastest Test fifty by an Australian: Bruce Yardley.At least, the record-holder until today. When Warner smashed a struggling Yasir Shah over mid-off for six from his 23rd ball of this innings, he had recorded the second-fastest Test fifty of all time. Only Misbah, whose 21-ball effort in Abu Dhabi in 2014 humiliated the Australians, has done so quicker. And, of course, it also meant that Warner had broken the long-standing mark set by Yardley in 1978.It is perhaps surprising that the milestone has stood for so long, especially as Adam Gilchrist’s 96-Test career, in which he reached fifty on 43 occasions occurred in the meantime. What is not surprising is that it should be Warner to eventually rewrite the record.For the second time in this Test, Warner did something special. On day one, he became just the fifth man in history to score a hundred before lunch on the first day of the Test – and the first to do so in Australia. One of the most remarkable features of that innings was that included not a single six. It was about as restrained as such a brisk innings can be.But his fastest fifty was different. The fourth over of the innings, bowled by Yasir, began with two sixes contemptuously smashed over long-on for sixes. A pair of fours followed, and Warner looked a realistic chance of producing the highest-scoring over in Test history. Instead, he tucked a single off the next ball, and waited a few overs to resume his hitting.Four consecutive fours were crunched off Imran Khan, and then his third six off Yasir brought up the half-century. Misbah’s record was safe, but Yardley’s was gone. And so it seems only fitting to reflect on the remarkable feat of Yardley, an offspinner who could swing the bat. And it was remarkable – for his 29-ball half-century was scored by a No.8 batsman against the might of Andy Roberts, Joel Garner and Colin Croft in Barbados.It’s surprising the record stood for that long in an era where Adam Gilchrist got past fifty 43 times•AFPYardley entered the match having just had the spine of a Caribbean black sea urchin removed from his foot, and further pain was to come once he walked out to face the West Indies fast bowlers. This was the match in which Graham Yallop became the first person to wear a full protective helmet in Test cricket, but Yardley wasn’t wearing one.”Kensington Oval reminded him of home at the WACA, where anything short tended to clear the stumps and rewarded the slasher,” Gideon Haigh wrote of Yardley in . So he slashed, and cut Garner for six over deep point, also copping blows to the elbow, throat and toe. “When I got hit in the elbow I thought my whole arm was gone,” Yardley recalled in Haigh’s book, “and I can’t have been thinking too straight because the next ball I tried to hook. It hit me in the throat.”Along the way, Yardley lost a few batting partners – Steve Rixon, Jeff Thomson and Wayne Clark all fell to the bowling of Garner. But the No.11, Jim Higgs, one of the more renowned bunnies in Australia’s recent Test history, defended staunchly and survived for long enough – 27 minutes, in fact – for Yardley to bring up his half-century by hooking a bouncer for another six.”I can still remember the innings,” Higgs recalled to ESPNcricinfo today. “It was scary in terms of some of the shots he played, but it was also scary from the point of view of the bowlers. I blocked and blocked and blocked…and he was trying to hit Croft over cover and they were going over backward point, one bounce. It was like a high-pressure, get-them-before-they-get-me type of innings from him. I remember it being full of adrenaline.”The one thing, though, that the Australians did not know at the time was that Yardley had scored the fastest Test fifty by an Australian. In fact, at the time it was the second-quickest in all of Test history, behind only a 28-ball effort from West Indian Foffie Williams in 1948 – at the same ground, Kensington Oval.”I must say I never knew that was the record,” Higgs said. “And we didn’t at the time, over there. No one made any comment about it.”How times have changed. Between commentary, social media and the scoreboard at the ground, when Warner slogged his six off Yasir, it was impossible not to know that it was Test cricket’s second-fastest fifty. But it was a very, very different innings from that played by Yardley.

'I am watching so better make it worthwhile'

Virat Kohli turns stalker in our Twitter round-up

Alex Bowden11-Nov-2016Wonder what Jimmy Neesham’s on about here?

Could it have been a foolish review in the India v England Test?

No, it was, of course, the US election.But he did have one positive thing to say about the winner.

And now another horror story. Skip past this tweet if you’re the sensitive sort.

Harrowing.We use quite a lot of KP’s tweets in this column. As of now, we consider this a personal service for Ed Cowan.

So here you go, Ed. Aside from the coffee catastrophe (Cofftastrophee? Catastrocoffee?) KP’s been training – although he didn’t seem to be fully into it.

Chris Gayle’s mind didn’t seem fully on the job either.

Perhaps, as Tim Bresnan says…

Perhaps Gayle was just weary from all the self-promotion.When you’re sitting around in your own bar and feel the need to tweet about it, there’s only one thing to brandish…

… a copy of your autobiography.You don’t need to do the hard yards in the gym to justify a selfie anyway. If you’re a cricketer, all you need to do is board a flight.

Or if you’re Umar Akmal, you’ve long since transcended the need for selfie excuses. These days they just pour out in a veritable torrent with no justification for any of them.This week his default standing-in-the-garden-wearing-sunglasses pic has been given an innovative twist. He’s experimenting with standing slightly at an angle.

Innovative.Meanwhile, old lags Younis and Misbah are still labouring under the misapprehension that they need to have been engaged in some kind of activity to warrant a photo.

You don’t need props, lads – although if they make Younis look like the happiest man on earth, then maybe it’s worth it after all.Providing people with a window into their personal lives is one reason why it’s not uncommon for celebrities to attract stalkers. However, it’s less common for a celebrity to begin stalking a member of the public.

Have a productive day! That’s a demand. He’s watching you. He’s watching you and the other 12.5 million people who follow him on Twitter.He’ll even watch you in the dark.

Somewhere in the world there is always a cricketer complaining about air travel.

Stuart Broad had a request before James Anderson boarded.

And don’t forget to take a selfie.

'We want to play an expansive brand of cricket'

Coach Russell Domingo talks about South Africa’s recovery from the slump they fell into in 2015-16, and what he expects from the coming year

Firdose Moonda15-Jan-2017South Africa have now won three consecutive Test series and sit at No. 3 on the Test rankings. Has the tide turned completely after last summer?
It’s the start of a new era for this team after the trials and tribulations of the past year or so, but we are not the finished article. There is still room for improvement in every department. The next year is a big year for us. We’ve got our rankings back up but we’ve still got work to do. There’s no way we can be complacent after three series.Which areas, specifically, do you want to concentrate on?
Consistency with the bat. Dean Elgar has stepped up in this series with a hundred and two scores over fifty. Before that, there hasn’t been a hot streak amongst one our batters. We are slowly getting there. It’s about trying to get two or three hundreds per series per player. We also have a new bowling attack and we need to find the best balance in our bowling attack.

“South African cricket has got more challenges than most other nations in the world. In terms of finances, in terms of Kolpaks, in terms of the make-up of the team. Yet, we always tend to find ourselves in the top three more times than not, in all formats”

How would you like to see this Test team progress?
We want to play a positive brand of cricket. We want to play an expansive brand of cricket. It will be clichéd to say “fearless”. When opportunities arise, we want to seize the initiative and rather err on the positive than the conservative, and we want to continue to grow that. We are going to make mistakes. Someone is going to get caught on the boundary and you are all going to say, “What the hell is he doing, how can he play that shot?” But that’s cool. That’s the way we want to try and play our cricket.Are you happy with the way the openers have performed?
If you want to have a quality Test team, you need a quality opening partnership and we definitely seem to be moving that way at the moment. Stephen Cook and Dean have got a good thing going. They complement each other really well. They are both gutsy players. The way they played on the first morning here [at the Wanderers] was wonderful. They only put on 45, but it felt like a hundred because of the nature of the wicket.Are these the kinds of pitches you would like to see used for home series?

It depends on who you are playing against. If you are playing against Australia, who are historically not a great team on slower wickets, you might want to play more on coastal conditions. If you are playing a subcontinent team , you want to play them on these types of wickets.In six Tests this season, against Australia and Sri Lanka, Dean Elgar has made 469 runs, with two hundreds and two fifties•AFPAre you concerned about Temba Bavuma’s form?

When the team is winning there’s always going to be one batter that’s struggling for form. That’s just the nature of Test batting. Three Tests ago, Temba probably won the game with Quinton de Kock in Hobart, when he got that wonderful 70-odd and set the game up for us in tough conditions. A Test before that, he also got runs when we were 60 [81] for 5. It’s the nature of international cricket. You can’t have all six or all seven of your batters firing at the same time. When one batter is struggling, it’s important that the other guys contribute.The depth of the talent pool was under scrutiny, not only after injuries to bowlers last year but also because of the spate of Kolpak signings. Are you happy with the resources at your disposal?
South Africa are blessed in that we seem to produce really good cricketers. I have been speaking to the Under-19 coaches and there are some high-quality players in the U-19 side now, who, in a couple of years, can progress to the national side the way a Quinton de Kock or Kagiso Rabada did. We are very fortunate that we have a good schooling system that can produce the young players.Do you think there was an overreaction to the troubles of last summer?

I was saying to someone the other day, and I am not comparing, but South African cricket has got more challenges than most other nations in the world. That’s the truth. In terms of finances, in terms of Kolpaks, in terms of the make-up of the team. That’s just the way it is. Other teams maybe don’t have to deal with it. A team like England. Yet, we always tend to find ourselves in the top three more times than not, in all formats. There’s a lot to be appreciative of about the way South African cricket operates and the way the players go about their business. Not many teams face the sort of challenges we face. Maybe the public at times just expect you to be No. 1 at absolutely everything and it’s just not possible when old, mature, experienced, high-quality players leave and potentially talented players come into the team. The likes of Quinton de Kock, Temba Bavuma, Kagiso Rabada and Stephen Cook, to a certain degree, take a little bit of time before they get to that level. Some of those guys are now getting to that level and that’s why the team is performing better.

“There are some high-quality players in the U-19 side now, who, in a couple of years, can progress to the national side the way a Quinton de Kock or Kagiso Rabada did”

Did you think there was a chance you would lose your job?

I could go tomorrow. Nothing is certain. I by no means look too far ahead in my coaching career. I take it one series at a time. You never know what’s around the corner in coaching. I’ve always felt that the support that I’ve got from the players is the most important thing. If you’ve still got the support of the players, that’s all that matters. I’ve always felt I had that. It’s out of my control, what happens happens.We often talk about the players’ schedules and how packed those are, but coaches are also on the road for long periods of time. We’ve seen Australia give Darren Lehmann a break and split the responsibility. Would you also like some time off?

I am going home for two nights after this Test because if I didn’t go home for these two nights, I might only have had one or two nights until April 4, but when I get back here Tuesday, I am really excited by the group of players I am going to be working with. I am not going to be seeing Faf [du Plessis], JP [Duminy], Hashim [Amla], KG [Rabada]. There are going to be 13 completely new players in the T20 series. They will be so hungry and so desperate to make an impression for South African cricket. And that’s exciting for us. I’ve told our coaches, “Boys, we’ve got to have our A game here because it’s like first day of school for a lot of these guys.” They are so desperate to play for their country and it’s exciting for me to get to work with those types of players.

How a team meeting changed Bangladesh

After the drubbing in Galle, Bangladesh met to introspect. They decided they needed to pay more attention to the small things. They could not have hoped for a better effect in Colombo

Mohammad Isam at P Sara Oval19-Mar-2017It was an hour-long meeting that prompted a change in attitude, body language and energy over the five days at the P Sara Oval. The meeting was an effort to trigger introspection after the 259-run defeat in Galle, and the disappointments of the first three months of 2017.Coming into this Test, early 2017 had been an extension of the heartbreaks of 2016 for Bangladesh. Close calls had left them with nothing, most infamously in Bangalore last year, where they conjured up a way to lose the World T20 game against India. At home a few months later, they gave away winning positions to Afghanistan and England, and then did the same in New Zealand.In Wellington and Hyderabad, they had a chance to draw Tests against New Zealand and India in away Tests – a difficult enough task for many established teams. But here were Bangladesh poised for such a result. They couldn’t finish the job, though, which prompted many to question their stomach for a fight. In Galle, they reached a nadir, bowled out for 197 on the last day and that too quite meekly.After that game, having moved to Colombo, they sat in their dressing room on one of the training days at the P Sara Oval and spoke to each other, frankly, taking their own sweet time. Chandika Hathurusingha, Tamim Iqbal and later Mushfiqur Rahim explained later that this was a session they needed to recover from the Galle defeat.Coach Hathurusingha said change came in response to questions he asked the players. “They decided they needed to change,” Hathurusingha said. “I prompted the questions and then they had a heart-to-heart conversation in the dressing room for nearly one hour. The positive thing we saw here was their energy over the five days. We still have some areas to improve, but there’s vast difference in body language and effort in this game.”Some might be reminded of the meeting India had during the 2003 World Cup, after the crushing defeat to Australia early in the tournament. As per the book of their then coach, John Wright, , they introspected and decided that Sourav Ganguly will bat lower down while Sachin Tendulkar and Virender Sehwag opened. After that, they came out with a changed approach, and marched into the tournament’s final with a string of victories.Bangladesh, Mushfiqur said, spoke to each other about the value of doing small things right in a game, the small things that could come back to hurt a team later. Such closed-door meetings had happened in 2012, when the team made the final of the Asia Cup, and in 2015, when they stormed into the World Cup quarter-final. It didn’t take long for results to show then. It didn’t take long for results to show now.

Bangladesh emerged from Wellington and Hyderabad with plenty of lessons, but they needed a win to tell the world that it was not mere show. They needed to show they had substance, and this win has done that.

“We tried to understand the value of a run, a misfield,” Mushfiqur said. “Giving away runs in the first innings may not seem much at the time, but it comes back to hurt you at the end of the day. We tried to recognise these small things. The fact that we absorbed each and every bit of it was quite impressive; the batsmen and bowlers played with responsibility here, which made me happy.”In Wellington and Hyderabad, Bangladesh’s bowling proved to be their weakness as they failed to have an impact on the New Zealand and India line-ups. They had a very inexperienced attack – as is often the case for Bangladesh on tours – but with Courtney Walsh in charge, there was hope that it would learn to be more intelligent in its bowling.Mustafizur’s performance was outstanding in this game but it was Subashis Roy, a left-field choice ahead of Kamrul Islam Rabbi, Rubel Hossain and Taskin Ahmed, who provided steadiness from the other end. The spin attack too was efficient and though Taijul Islam was underused in the second innings, Shakib Al Hasan and Mehedi Hasan kept their ends tight when nothing else was happening.Hathurusingha said that Mustafizur’s spell on the fourth afternoon turned the game in Bangladesh’s favour, at a time when nothing was going the visitors’ way. He said that a bit of troubleshooting with Shakib also helped his bowling in this game. Shakib took four wickets in the second innings, while Mustafizur picked up three.”The game changed through Mustafizur’s spell after lunch on the fourth day. Nothing was happening, [and it was] very hot for the fast bowlers. He came and bowled a magnificent seven-over spell to take three wickets,” Hathurusingha said. “It was a crucial time of the game for me.”I had seen [Shakib] bowling against South Africa in 2010 or 2011. He was a different bowler here, and he showed it to me. We had a very good discussion on what he is not doing now. We discussed after seeing video footage. He bowled very well in this game. When Fizz [Mustafizur] was bowling from one end, [Shakib] checked the runs from the far end.”Bangladesh have now tasted a hard-fought away Test win. They emerged from Wellington and Hyderabad with plenty of lessons, and have had impressive individual performances in Tests of late, but they needed a win to tell the world that it was not all mere show. They needed to show they had substance, and the P Sara Oval win has done that.One meeting perhaps tweaked their mindset. Now, they have to keep reminding themselves of the small lessons they picked up in this game too. Maybe, ahead of their next Test, they can sit down again and remind themselves just how much they can still improve. Only then can they really succeed in the place they have always wanted to: Test cricket.

Williamson and Raval top of the class for New Zealand

Marks out of ten for the New Zealand squad that played the Test series against South Africa

Firdose Moonda30-Mar-20172:19

Hesson happy with how New Zealand are shaping up

9

Kane Williamson

The top run-scorer and the only one to score more than one hundred, Kane Williamson capped off his first season as captain with a typically fine showing with the bat. He led from the front with two classy centuries, which deserved more than the draws they were part of. In Dunedin, Williamson’s knock ensured New Zealand did not have cause to panic after Ross Taylor retired hurt and helped set them up to take a slender lead. In Hamilton, his 170 allowed him to equal Martin Crowe’s 17 Test centuries and become the youngest New Zealand player to 5,000 Test runs. His Hamilton hundred was chanceless and dominant, he paced the innings perfectly and set his team up to push for victory. Although he cannot find himself on the winning side of a coin toss and his DRS skills need work, as a leader Williamson shows great promise.

8

Jeet Raval

New Zealand needed someone who could be tighter outside the offstump than Martin Guptill; Jeet Raval has provided that. His solid technique is his greatest asset and it served him well against a South African attack who can exploit even the smallest weaknesses. He scored half-centuries in all three matches – in Dunedin and Wellington after Tom Latham had departed early – and shared in crucial partnerships with Kane Williamson in Dunedin and Hamilton and with Henry Nicholls in Wellington. His 88 was the third-highest score by a New Zealand opener against South Africa and though he will be disappointed he was not able to push on to a maiden century, he completed an impressive Test summer.

7.5

Neil Wagner

New Zealand’s highest wicket-taker and the series’ most successful seamer had to take on the additional responsibility of bowling in an attack without Tim Southee and Trent Boult. Wagner had only played one Test in which both of them had not featured in the XI and that was on debut in 2012, but he accepted the embraced the challenge and led the attack. As expected, Wagner was indefatigable in his use of the short ball but also showed some variation. One of the fuller deliveries he dished out took out Hashim Amla’s middle stump in Dunedin. New Zealand have come to depend on him to make things happen and in every match, he delivered.Colin de Grandhomme

On the face of it, Colin de Grandhomme should not be very dangerous; he bowls in the late 120s. But he troubled South Africa with the quality of the questions he asked with full deliveries outside the off stump. He got three gifts in the first innings in Wellington, a reward for a disciplined start when asked to open the bowling, and he was kept in the role for Hamilton where he enjoyed more success. His batting was the bonus New Zealand wanted; in Hamilton, he scored his maiden half-century and upped the scoring rate at the right time to put New Zealand in their best position of the series – and edge ahead of Neesham as their premier allrounder.Matt Henry

Having waited for an opportunity behind Tim Southee and Trent Boult, Matt Henry took his chance and set the tone with the new ball in Hamilton. He removed two of South Africa’s top four early on and showed the same intent in the second innings. Henry was effective with both short and full deliveries, and deepened the collapse when he got rid of Temba Bavuma in the second innings to leave South Africa with just one recognised batsmen left in a bid to stave off defeat.

7

BJ Watling

A man with an appetite for a fight, BJ Watling gives New Zealand lower-order muscle which was most evident in Dunedin. His fifty there and partnership with Kane Williamson allowed New Zealand to take the lead. He also played determined knocks in Wellington and Hamilton. He often runs out of support, though, and there are continued calls for him to bat higher up, which would be difficult given his wicketkeeping responsibilities.

6

Henry Nicholls

With pressure over his place at No. 5 growing, Henry Nicholls came into this series needing runs to prove himself and he got them in Wellington. His hundred came a time New Zealand needed it most – they were 101 for 5 and without Ross Taylor in the first innings – and allowed them to mount a challenge. He did not have any other scores of significance and was twice out in single figures, which makes consistency his next challenge.Jeetan Patel

An unexpected pick, Jeetan Patel’s comeback was prompted by New Zealand’s decision to play on slower surfaces to negate South Africa’s quicks – that necessitated two specialist spinners in Dunedin and Hamilton. Initially, he operated as Quinton de Kock’s nemesis and dismissed him twice in the first Test after also getting rid of him in the fourth and fifth ODI, but de Kock did not remain his bunny for too long. Patel continued to trouble South Africa’s batsmen though. More crucially for him, he emerged as New Zealand’s first-choice spinner, edging out Mitchell Santner in Wellington.Trent Boult

Trent Boult did the damage early and later on in South Africa’s first innings in Dunedin. He got rid of Stephen Cook and then took three wickets with the old ball when he found substantial movement. He was particularly impressive in keeping run-scoring to a minimum with more than a third of his overs being maidens. Boult picked up a groin injury in the second innings, which ruled him out of the rest of series.

5

Tom Latham

After a poor start to the series with 24 runs from his first three innings,Tom Latham returned to form with fifty in Hamilton, where he batted with more patience and composure than he had in the previous two matches. Latham’s runs came on the back of an improved performance in the field, where he took a blinder at short leg to dismiss Faf du Plessis on the paddle sweep to redeem himself after a slip-catch clanger in Dunedin. Latham still has work do against the moving ball but can be pleased with his season’s work.Mitchell Santner

He was outperformed in Dunedin by Jeetan Patel and then left out of the Wellington Test but Mitchell Santner came back fairly strongly in Hamilton. The three and a quarter hours he spent at the crease only yielded 41 runs but came at a crucial time for New Zealand. Kane Williamson was holding court and needed support, which Santner provided, to build the lead. His credentials as an allrounder are growing, though he would have wanted a few more wickets to his name.

4

Tim Southee

Left out in Dunedin to accommodate two specialist spinners, Tim Southee may have gone to Wellington itching to prove his worth but he only picked up three wickets. He picked up the bulk of the workload in the first innings and proved threatening upfront but did not get the rewards he would have been after. A hamstring injury kept him out of the Hamilton match.

3

Neil Broom

Called up because of his experience in first-class cricket, Neil Broom was tasked with batting in Ross Taylor’s No. 4 spot and did not have an easy time of it. He was on the receiving end of two fantastic deliveries in Wellington and then shouldered arms to Kagiso Rabada in Hamilton to end the series with not much to show and questions over whether he has a future as a Test cricketer.

2

James Neesham

Picked as the allrounder in Dunedin ahead of Colin de Grandhomme, James Neesham only bowled 13 overs in the match and was dismissed for seven. He returned for Wellington but failed to contribute as much as New Zealand would have wanted and was dropped for Hamilton. Neesham needed to hold the middle-order together better and present more threat with the ball but failed to do both.

Unmarked

Ross Taylor

Ross Taylor tore his calf early in his Dunedin innings and had to retire hurt before he could do any real damage – to himself or South Africa. He returned to bat with the tail to help New Zealand edge ahead but could not take any further part in the series.

Young talent aiming to fly Welsh flag

ESPNcricinfo previews Glamorgan’s prospects for the 2017 season

David Hopps28-Mar-2017Last season:

In:
Out: James Kettleborough, Dewi Penrhyn Jones (both released), Mark Wallace, Dean Cosker (both retired)
Overseas: Jacques Rudolph (SA)2016 in a nutshell
Robert Croft’s first season as head coach was a difficult affair as Glamorgan finished only one place above the wooden spoonists, Derbyshire, but at least by the end of the season there were a clutch of impressive performances from young players in which to take pride. Aneurin Donald, who struck 15 sixes in his 234 against Derbyshire at Colwyn Bay; Kiran Carlson, who became the youngest Glamorgan century-maker, at 18 years 119 days, when he reached three figures against Essex; and Owen Morgan, who made a maiden first-class hundred as nightwatchman against Worcestershire, were just three whose flashes of individual brilliance brought hope. Glamorgan’s best team moments were reserved for the NatWest Blast, in which Colin Ingram struck a record-equalling 29 sixes before Yorkshire ousted them in the quarter-finals.2017 prospects
A young side with a strong Welsh flavour will not lack for loyalty from supporters, but Glamorgan look desperately short of bowling stocks. The veteran Australian Michael Hogan will seek to squeeze out one more good season as he approaches 36, having expressed fears that he has lost some of his zip, but a heavy onus seems to lie upon Netherlands’ Timm van der Gugten, who took 56 wickets in his first Championship summer. The absence of two stalwarts, wicketkeeper Mark Wallace and indefatigable left-arm spinner Dean Cosker, will also test resources elsewhere. Top-order batsman Chris Cooke will assume Wallace’s wicketkeeping role and Morgan will have a golden opportunity to nail down the left-arm spinner’s role. More consistency from Glamorgan’s young batsmen should at least help their runs tally – and the fact that Ingram is fit enough this season to play all formats is a huge positive.In charge
Jacques Rudolph continues as captain for the third successive season despite a personally disappointing 2016 with the bat, when he averaged only 24.40 in the Championship. He will hope for considerably better results in his 20th season in the first-class game. Croft’s priority is to continue his excellent work with Glamorgan’s homegrown players. There is just as big a challenge for chief executive Hugh Morris and his marketing team as they seek to build enough enthusiasm for cricket in south Wales to fill their international stadium not just when England visit (or the British Lions as Croft prefers to regard them) but also for NatWest Blast nights. An operating loss of £308,000 in 2016 after considerable debt write downs the previous year illustrates the extent of the task.Key player
Cooke missed the last two months of last season with a back injury, which must cause slight misgivings as he prepares to step into the wicketkeeping role vacated by Wallace. Wallace, who ended an 18-year career last month to become a PCA development and welfare manager, made his Glamorgan debut at 17 and went on to become their most successful wicketkeeper-batsman. Cooke, who finished in the top three of Glamorgan’s batting averages in all formats, will aim to maintain that form as well as allowing the club to make light of Wallace’s absence behind the sticks.Bright young thing
While Glamorgan’s young batsmen attract the bulk of the attention, hopes are also high for Lukas Carey after a four-wicket debut against Northants last August. Croft went back to his local club, Pontarddulais, on the outskirts of Swansea to find Carey, whose grandfather Stuart played amateur cricket for Wales. Carey totted up 13 wickets in three first-class matches and Glamorgan, although wary to ask too much at 19, will be eager to see further signs of progress.ESPNcricinfo verdict
Glamorgan’s young players have promise, but they will need strong performances from senior men if they are to find the stability in which they can flourish. Twenty years after their Championship win, the county have more modest ambitions. A tough season lies ahead, especially in the Championship.Bet365 odds: Specsavers Championship, Div 2: 16-1; NatWest Blast 20-1; Royal London Cup 25-1

'It's up to me to make sure the story has a better ending'

Having served time in prison and written a book about his life and career, Chris Lewis is ready to take charge of his destiny again

George Dobell08-Sep-20171:59

What advice would Chris Lewis give his younger self?

“There’s an expression in the Caribbean,” Chris Lewis says. “‘The man that can’t hear is destined to feel.'” He sighs. “I guess I had to learn things the hard way.”Lewis had heard all the warnings, of course. He knew examples of former players who had fallen on hard times. He must, on a level, have understood the need to plan and prepare for life after his playing career.But it ended earlier than he thought it would – it nearly always does – and the benefit season he was relying upon was suddenly snatched away from him. Without savings, plans or many transferable skills, he found himself with a creaking body, a lifestyle to sustain, a family to support, and all revenue streams evaporated.The result? He made a poor choice.As he recounts in his book , he accepted £50,000 (which he never received) to import cocaine from St Lucia into the UK. “This would give me the breathing space I needed,” he writes. “All I could think of was the idea of having no money and not being able to see a way out. I remember my thought at the time: just once, maybe, to make a bit of money and give myself a little bit of breathing space.”He was subsequently apprehended at Gatwick airport. He pleaded innocent – “I just couldn’t stand the thought of going to jail,” he says now – but was found guilty and sentenced to 13 years. He served six and a half. On the first night he considered hanging himself with his bed sheets.Now he is out, but on the brink of his own half-century and with what he refers to as “a skills deficit”, his future remains uncertain. At the back of his mind is the thought that, for all his success on a cricket pitch, he may well be remembered, first and foremost, as a convicted drug smuggler.”That’s a fact,” he says. “I am a shamed cricketer. There’s no point me denying it. I’d hate that to be the way I’m remembered, but the fact is, unless I change that perception, it’s the way it’s going to be. I can’t moan about it. It is the consequence of my actions. I have to reflect on my choices and take the responsibility for them.”But it’s not the end of the story. I have it in me to write the next few chapters and I have to make sure that I take everything bad and turn it into something good. It’s up to me to make sure the story has a better ending.”

“I let down my family and my community. Having spoken out about every stereotype for years, the lie that suggests all young black men are drug dealers, here I was enforcing them”

It is one of Lewis’ qualities that he makes no excuses for himself, whether he is talking of the criminal conviction, his infamously poor timekeeping – it cost him both his England place and the captaincy of Leicestershire – or the “prat without a hat” heatstroke incident in the Caribbean.”Yes, of course there are reasons. But there are no excuses,” he says now.The only real regret is the drug smuggling. He sees the timekeeping issues, which effectively ended his England career at The Oval in 1996 (he overslept, pretended he had a puncture and arrived 90 minutes late, just before play on the fourth day of a Test against Pakistan), as “part of the learning experience”.”I look back on a lot of those mistakes and laugh,” he says. “I was just a young bloke trying to fit too much into my life.”When I was rushing to get to The Oval, I was desperately hoping someone would see the funny side. I knew I was out of line; I knew I was wrong. But I hoped they might, on a level, see that it wasn’t exactly the crime of the century.”But surely, he can see that discipline is a necessary attribute of a professional sportsman? And how would he have managed him? He had a period as captain and enjoyed some success. Indeed, he captained Leicestershire for more than half the season when they won the County Championship in 1998.”Oh, good question,” he says. “I suppose I might have encouraged me to try and fit in a bit more.”I didn’t drink, I didn’t like pub culture, and maybe because of that, I didn’t form the bonds with my team-mates that I might have done. They never had much empathy for me because they never got to know me. I probably could have tried harder.”I really enjoyed my time at Leicestershire and Surrey. But at Nottinghamshire, where I probably played the best cricket of my career, things weren’t as easy.”Because he was black?”Not necessarily. Because I was different. Maybe because they simply didn’t like me. But my heritage, my background, my culture is all a part of what makes me me.”Chris Lewis made a brief comeback with Surrey before going to prison for drug-smuggling•PA PhotosHe accepts, though, that his issues with punctuality could “give an impression that I did not care about my sport” and that “my coaches and colleagues must have been tearing their hair out”. But what still makes him wince in irritation is the suggestion that he was in any way lazy or over-reliant on his natural talent.”None of it was natural,” he says. “It was honed to a level that it may have appeared natural. Look, in the Caribbean, kids weren’t allowed to play in the house. Your mum might have a couch that was meant to last a lifetime. That’s why it was still covered in its plastic wrapper. She didn’t really want you even sitting on it, let alone playing on it! So by the time I came to the UK, aged ten, I was probably more athletic than the typical ten-year-old in London.”Then, later in my career, I was in the gym while others were still asleep. I was practising late at night. I was running on the streets at six o’clock in the morning. It suited other people’s agendas to suggest I had this huge amount of natural talent, so they could imply I was lazy. I wasn’t lazy and I wasn’t naturally talented. I was just a bit different.”I’ve found myself watching games and thought, ‘Why doesn’t he try harder?’ But then I pull myself up. You can’t tell. Just because someone is perceived as doing something with some style – batting like David Gower, for example – doesn’t mean they find it easier. And it doesn’t mean they don’t have to try.”Lewis’ belief is that the treatment of black players of his generation led them to advise their children not to follow the same path. It is an interesting theory that may have parallels with the ongoing issues in attracting cricketers of Asian origin, especially Muslims, into the traditional pathways that, at club level, often still revolve around a culture of bonding in pubs and bars.”I can tell you for a fact, people I played with have told their kids not to bother,” he says. “They always had to be a little bit better. Maybe things have changed, but that’s how it felt then.”All of which makes his fall from grace harder to accept.”I spent my career fighting stereotypes,” he says. “I didn’t just argue against the rhetoric that young black men from inner cities got involved in drugs or crime. I knew it was wrong. I knew it.”And then I got involved in drugs smuggling.” He shakes his head at the ridiculousness of the sentence he has just uttered. “Really, I let down my family and my community.”And it wasn’t just me who had their head in their hands. It was every black male in Britain. I let them all down. I can’t downplay that. I can’t shrug it off. I regret it not just because of what it did to my life, but because of the damage it did to my family and my community.”So how does he make it right? “I have to prevent other people making the same mistakes,” he says. “Whether I’m talking to young cricketers, sportspeople, immigrants, kids in inner cities, or the community at large… I have to make them understand the dangers and [get them to] make better choices.”Of course they’ve heard the stories, too. Of course they think ‘It won’t happen to me’; every generation does. But I have a story to tell, and if I can save one or two from the same fate, maybe I can make some amends.”

“I was prepared for nobody in cricket wanting anything to do with me but it’s been the other way around. It has given me a lot of energy”

He has already started. Ahead of the 2016 domestic season in England, Lewis travelled the first-class counties delivering a talk to county players about the dangers of failing to plan for their futures. He will soon appear on National Prison Radio, preaching similar messages to those who have already erred, while there is talk of his story being turned into a play, written by Dougie Blaxland (aka James Graham-Brown, the former Kent cricketer), who wrote one about Colin Milburn.Lewis hopes, in time, to be invited into schools to address teenagers. “I just need a first headmaster to take a chance on me,” he says. “I think I can make a positive contribution.”With few skills outside the game – “I took a few courses in prison,” he says, – he has also returned to playing a bit of club cricket and represents Lashings. And a few weeks ago, he was invited to The Oval as part of Surrey’s 100th Test celebrations. To his great relief, he was warmly received by everyone.”It’s funny,” he says. “I did an interview with Mike Atherton the other day. I was a bit nervous. I felt like a naughty schoolboy going to see the headmaster. You know? Like he didn’t really approve? I guess because he was my captain.”But he was warm and friendly and we had a great time chatting about the old days. We had a good laugh.”And that’s the way it’s been with everyone, really. I was prepared for nobody in cricket wanting anything to do with me, but it’s been the other way around, really. It’s given me a lot of energy.”Like many cricketers, Lewis has been grateful for the help from Jason Ratcliffe and the Professional Cricketers’ Association. While Ratcliffe left his role at the PCA the best part of a year ago – he had been assistant chief executive – and the nature of these interventions demands a certain amount of privacy that prohibits coverage, it is no exaggeration to say they have been life-changing often and life-saving on occasions. Certainly Lewis, who received prison visits from Ratcliffe and continues to work with him now, has no doubts. “I’ll never be able to thank him enough,” he says.There will be those who suggest Lewis is not deserving of the game’s help. And it’s a reasonable point: there are many former players who through no fault of their own are struggling financially. Might they be deemed more deserving?But maybe that is the wrong way to think about it. The aim of involving Lewis now is not so much about rehabilitating him – though that doesn’t seem such a terrible motivation – but using him in an educational capacity to prevent others making similar errors. It’s worth noting, too, that he has received no “benevolent” funding from the PCA. He was briefly employed by them to travel the first-class counties, but there have been no handouts.There’s a striking passage in the book. In it Lewis suggests “the worst moment of my life” was not his arrest or even that first night in prison when he contemplated suicide. No, it came in a game towards the end of his career at Leicestershire, when the crowd booed him.”Yes, that was the worst,” he says. “It was very personal. Going to jail was awful but the immediate sentencing was impersonal. It was because I had broken the law. I’d been booed a few times. I was always booed at Yorkshire and in Kent. But I found that energising. I saw it as them perceiving me as a threat. But this was different. It was disdain. It was personal. And it was so unjust.”The reason? Lewis was, he says, contacted by match-fixers who wanted to involve him in corruption and claimed they already had three England players on board. Lewis wasn’t interested, and knowing that he could be in trouble if he did not report the approach, did so to both the ECB and the police. In short, he did exactly what he was supposed to do in such circumstances. It later emerged that Stephen Fleming had reported the same businessman to the ICC within 48 hours of Lewis doing so to the ECB.Somehow the information Lewis reported found its way into the media and Lewis was portrayed, by some, as an embittered troublemaker who wanted to drag a few down with him.”I was thrown to the wolves,” Lewis writes in his book. “I gave the ECB the ball and they absolutely f***** it up. The general feeling was that I had maliciously made up stories about England players being involved in match-fixing for some financial gain.”The results were catastrophic. Leicestershire stopped selecting him, knowing that there was a clause in his contract (inserted to protect them in case of injury) that stated he could be released if he did not play a certain number of games. Even though he had three years left on his contract and the promise of a benefit season, he left the club. He left the game (there was very brief comeback for Surrey in 2008, by which time he was 40 and, in his words, “a pie-thrower”) as something of a pariah.Chris Lewis played 32 Tests and 53 ODIs for England•Getty ImagesHe will not say so – it could be interpreted as trying to make excuses for himself – but there might be a contributory element to his later struggles. It is no excuse, of course – lots of people experience serious financial setbacks without resorting to crime, and as he writes in his book, “I could have gone down to the dole office” – but there may be a lesson for cricket here. If the game is really serious about combating match-fixing, it must find a way to better protect and respect the whistle-blowers. The experience of Lewis, Don Topley, Ian Pont, Brendon McCullum and others would suggest there is a long way to go.It is an oddity of Lewis’ career that, for all the success – he played in a World Cup final (and was twice Man of the Match in the qualifying games), he made a Test century in India, he claimed three five-wicket hauls and won County Championships and Lord’s finals – if you think about the two clips of him which are most repeated on TV now, one involves Wasim Akram bowling him out first ball with a peach of a delivery in the 1992 World Cup final, and the other shows Brian Lara pulling him for four to break the record for the highest Test score.”He trod on his stumps,” Lewis says. “When he played that shot, he trod on his stumps. The bails went up in the air but settled back in place.”That stuff doesn’t sit especially easily with me. If you are going to be involved in cricket records, you want to be setting them. Not having them set against you. Those are not the things that I look back with any particular fondness.”What does he look back on with fondness? “My debut,” he says. “My ODI debut, in Trinidad. The emotion I had. The pride. The excitement of a boy who couldn’t believe he’d made it so far. That was the pinnacle for me. I don’t think that feeling was ever replicated.”During his playing career, Lewis was described, gloriously, as “the enigma with no variation” by Vic Marks. And it is probably true that his ability – that ability he worked so hard to achieve that it appeared natural – did not gain the rewards we thought it might have done. Unfulfilled? That would be harsh. But completely fulfilled? No, you can’t claim that.And here he is now: fallen, yes, but somehow impressive and motivated as never before. Still promising after all these years. Still full of potential. There’s a line musicians use: there’s no such thing as a wrong note; it’s the next note you play that determines whether it was good or bad. The most important chapter in the Chris Lewis story is the next one.”The question ‘Who is the real Chris Lewis?’ will be answered in actions rather than words,” he says. “I choose to add more to my community, and never to make it lesser again.”

SA need to scratch their opener itch

Stephen Cook was discarded and Heino Kuhn has struggled to make the step up, while a younger option in Aiden Markram awaits his chance

Firdose Moonda at The Oval30-Jul-20171:32

Faf hitting the gym to cope with frustration – Birrell

Let’s start with a disclaimer. The opening pair are not the only reason South Africa have struggled in this Test match, they are not even the main reason – this game was all but lost because of Vernon Philander’s illness and the inability of the other bowlers to make up for his absence – but they are an issue that needs discussing.In their last 12 Test innings, South Africa’s top two have averaged 12.91 with a best stand of 21. In that time, they have tried four different players: Dean Elgar, Stephen Cook, Theunis de Bruyn and Heino Kuhn. The only thing that is obvious is that Elgar is a keeper. Since January 2015, he has been far and away the stand-out South Africa opener not least because he has played the most matches. He averages over 40, a decent benchmark by anyone’s standards and though his style is not pretty, it is mostly effective.The next question is who should partner him and in South Africa the choices are few. They would be because South Africa is a notoriously tough place to open the batting, Graeme Smith used to call it the toughest in the world and the numbers just about agree. In the last five years, openers average 30.52 in the country, more than five runs less than the global average of 35.96.Although a less-demanding environment to Tests, it stands to reason that openers who average over 40 in first-class cricket in South Africa must be doing pretty well. That includes Cook (40.03) and Kuhn (44.28), who have maintained impressive numbers over more than a decade and averaged 49.04 and 56.72 over the last two first-class competitions respectively. The only other batsmen in the same league is Aiden Markram, who played six franchise first-class games last summer and averaged 60.11.Before this series, the selection panel decided Cook was done. Long before. They dropped him for the final Test against New Zealand in March, after he had scored 17 runs in four innings on the tour, but was not the first time in struggled. In Australia, four months earlier, Cook made 35 runs in the first two Tests and his technique – loose outside the off stump and lacking in footwork – came under scrutiny but a century in the day-nigher in Adelaide bought him some time. Cook went on to score another hundred in the home series against Sri Lanka, where he averaged 43.2 before the lean run in New Zealand that cost him his place. And it must cause us to ask, were the selectors too hasty?Knowing that they won the series in New Zealand because of a rained-out day in Hamilton and a good session in Wellington and not through consistency, they felt some changes were necessary before a big summer in England. The lack of big runs and the absence of hundreds – South Africa only have one century from their last five Tests – suggested the only something they could do was in the line-up and with a reserve middle-order batsmen in de Bruyn already around, the only other something was at the top.Heino Kuhn has his off stump flattened by Stuart Broad•Getty ImagesHaving decided Cook would not play in the series, the choice was between Kuhn and Markram; between a 33-year-old who has been a consistent performer on the first-class scene and had been overlooked for too long and a 22-year-old, who could become a long-term solution; between rewarding someone who had done their time and deciding it was time to take a leap of faith in someone new. Perhaps out of a sense of duty, but more likely on recent form the selectors chose the former. Kuhn had the better run in the A tour of England, in which he scored a double-hundred against Hampshire and a century against the England Lions, so his ability to get runs in these conditions edged him ahead. But he has been unable to translate that at Test level.Though his temperament appears hardened, his technique and shot selection has left something to be desired. He has been hesitant to get forward in previous innings, been worked over by Stuart Broad and when he did decide to go on the front foot in the second innings here at The Oval, he was out playing across the line. In his six innings so far, Kuhn has only once faced more than 30 balls. By comparison, in 19 innings, Cook did that 12 times.So now the question is about the future. Whatever happens at Old Trafford, South Africa will have to decide how they going to tackle the home summer, which is scheduled to include 10 Tests. Are they going to stick with Kuhn, at least early on, and see if he fares better in home conditions or are they going to take the plunge and pick Markram, allow him the time to grow into the role and know that they have someone who could be a feature for a few years? Giving a player a fair run, which includes enough time to see how they perform in different conditions against different opposition could give Kuhn an extended run but all sense would suggest Markram must be the man to take over. If and when he does, he may not solve all South Africa’s struggles but it may be a start.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus